The analysis of the linguistic and philosophical paradigms based on the concept of discourse in the academic study of religion


Views: 9 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

Keywords:

discourse; linguistics; semiotics; M. Foucault; discursive practices; discourse analysis; discursive laws; register, modus

Abstract

The article provides an overview of existing definitions, research and achievements in the field of linguistics and philosophy concerning the concept of discourse. Additionally, it offers a new analysis of discourse as a philosophical-linguistic phenomenon and paradigm. A review of studies on the concept and term "discourse" is provided, and the history of the formation of the concept of discourse analysis as a separate direction is analyzed. The directions of application of discourse as a term and concept in the context of modern science are shown. It also defines the philosophical aspect on the basis of the works of M. Foucault. In this regard, Foucault's theories also examine discourse as a coercive principle that causes people to feel fear and apprehension, as a great force that regulates inconsistencies, and as a tool for creating restrictive, and regulating processes. The rules on which discursive laws are based are considered, and their role in the formation of communicative competence is analyzed. The influence of extralinguistic features of discourse has been studied. The differences and connections between the macro and micro levels of the structure of the discourse are shown. An explanation and classification of discursive modes are given, their features are described. Schools conducting discursive research are shown and an overview of their methods is given. Attention is drawn to the importance and characteristics of oral discourse. The role of discourse in the establishment of linguistic communication is considered and conclusions are drawn.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arutjunova N.D. Diskurs // Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. (Moscow, 1990, 688 p.) [in Russian].

Benvenist Je. Obshhaja lingvistika [General linguistics]. (Moscow,1974, 448 p.) [in Russian]

Borbot'ko V.G. Jelementy teorii diskursa: Uchebnoe posobie. [The elements of the theory of discourse. Didactic material]. (Groznyj, 1981, 113 p.) [in Russian]

Brown, G., & Yule, G. Discourse analysis. – Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1983. – 304 p.

Demo, Douglas A. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Center for Applied Linguistics. 2001. URL: www.cal.org/ericcll.

Dejk T.A., van. Jazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikacija [Language. Cognition. Communication]. (Moscow, 1989, 307 p.) [in Russian]

Filosofskaja jenciklopedija [Philosophic encyclopedia] http://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/enc_philosophy [in Russian]

Fuko M. Arheologija znanija [The archaeology of the knowledge]. (Kiev, 1996a, 208 p.) [in Russian]

Fuko M. Porjadok diskursa // Volja k istine: po tu storonu znanija, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznyh let [The order of the discourse]. (Moscow, 1996b, 448 p.) [in Russian]

Hess-Lüttich E. W. B. Texttheorie und Soziolinguistik - eine pragmatische Synthese. Entwürfe zur Anwendung linguistischer Literaturanalyse / Inaug. Diss. – Bonn, 1979. – 320 p.

Karasik V.I. Jazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs [The language circle: individual, concepts, discourse]. (Volgograd, 2004, 390 p.) [in Russian]

Kibrik A.A. Modus, zhanry i drugie parametry klassifikacii diskursov. Voprosy jazykoznanija, № 2. – 2009. [Modes, genres and other parameters of the classification of discourse. The problems of linguistics, № 2. – 2009] – 3-21 ss. [n Russian]

Oleshkov M.Ju. Osnovy funkcional'noj lingvistiki: diskursivnyj aspekt: ucheb. posobie dlja studentov fak. rus. jaz. i lit. [The basics of functional linguistics: discursive aspect]. (Nizhnij Tagil, 2006, 146 p) [in Russian]

Parret H. Prolégomènes à la théorie de l’énonciation: De Nusserl à la pragmatique. – Berne, Francfort/M., New York, Paris, 1987. – 418 p.

Savel'eva V.V. Hudozhestvennyj tekst i hudozhestvennyj mir: sootnesennost' i organizacija: avtoref. dis…dokt. filol. Nauk [Literary Text and the Artistic World: Relevance and Organization]. (Almaty, 2002, 48 p.) [in Russian]

Serio P. O jazyke vlasti: kriticheskij analiz. v kn: Filosofija jazyka: v granicah i vne granic: Mezhdunar. ser. monogr. T 1. [About the language of the power: critical analysis]. Harkov, 1993, 83-100 pp.) [in Russian]

Serio P. Kak chitajut teksty vo Francii // Kvadratura smysla. Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa / Per. s franc. i portug. [How do they read texts in France]. (Moscow, 1999, 14-53 pp.) [in Russian]

Stepanov Ju.S. Al'ternativnyj mir, Diskurs, Fakt i princip. Prichinnosti // Jazyk i nauka konca XX veka. Sb. Statej [Alternative world. Discourse. Fact and principle]. (Moscow, 1995, 35-73 pp.) [in Russian]

Shejgal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [The semiotics of the political discourse]. (Volgograd, 2000, 368 s.) [in Russian]

Tjupa V.I. Analitika hudozhestvennogo. Vvedenie v literaturovedcheskij analiz [The analytics of the artistic. Introduction to the literary analysis]. (Moscow, 2001, 192 p.) [in Russian]

Wodak R. Disorders of Discourse. – London: Longman, 1996. – 200 p.

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Abubakirova, A., Shimtemir, M. ., & Duissenbayeva, A. (2024). The analysis of the linguistic and philosophical paradigms based on the concept of discourse in the academic study of religion . Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 149(4). Retrieved from https://bulhistphaa.enu.kz/index.php/main/article/view/901

Issue

Section

RELIGION SERIES