Assessment of the Value Levels of the Categories of Cultural Heritage, Cultural Landscape, and Cultural Tourism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective (based on Alakol lake)
Research article
Views: 49 / PDF downloads: 17
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2024-149-4-210-225Keywords:
philosophy of culture; heritage philosophy; cultural heritage; heritage: cultural landscape; cultural tourism; Alakol lake; historical tourismAbstract
This article explores the epistemological challenges of interpreting local knowledge through the theoretical framework of the cultural landscape of Alakol. It emphasizes an interdisciplinary approach, integrating historical, regional, and cultural studies within a philosophical-cultural context. By applying a cultural philosophy perspective, the article expands traditional disciplinary boundaries, enabling a broader understanding of the cultural landscape beyond a regional case study. It also examines the potential of UNESCO’s methodological approach to cultural landscape description for enhancing Alakol’s tourism appeal.
The concepts from heritage philosophy and the philosophy of cultural landscapes to assess trends in evaluating the value of cultural heritage. It has been explored how these approaches can redefine cultural heritage as a cohesive system. Central to the discussion are key terms such as “cultural heritage”, “cultural landscape”, and “cultural tourism” with a focus on their interconnections, classifications, and criteria. Additionally, the article investigates the role of cultural heritage and landscapes in tourism, the importance of their integration for cultural tourism development, and their impact on local well-being. The analysis of Alakol’s cultural landscape potential identifies strengths and challenges for promoting cultural tourism and increasing interest in the region.This article explores the epistemological challenges of interpreting local knowledge through the theoretical framework of the cultural landscape of Alakol lake. It emphasizes an interdisciplinary approach, integrating historical, regional, and cultural studies within a philosophical-cultural context. By applying a cultural philosophy perspective, the article expands traditional disciplinary boundaries, enabling a broader understanding of the cultural landscape beyond a regional case study. It also examines the potential of UNESCO’s methodological approach to cultural landscape description for enhancing Alakol’s tourism appeal. The concepts from heritage philosophy and the philosophy of cultural landscapes to assess trends in evaluating the value of cultural heritage. It has been explored how these approaches can redefine cultural heritage as a cohesive system. Key terms such as “cultural heritage”, “cultural landscape”, and “cultural tourism” with a focus on their interconnections, classifications, and criteria have become central to the discussion. Additionally, the article investigates the role of cultural heritage and landscapes in tourism, the importance of their integration for cultural tourism development, and their impact on local well-being. The analysis of Alakol’s cultural landscape potential identifies strengths and challenges for promoting cultural tourism and increasing interest in the region.
Downloads
References
Banzhaf, E., Anderson, S. et al. Urban-Rural Dependencies and Opportunities to Design Nature-Based Solutions for Resilience in Europe and China. Land. 2022, Vol. 11. 480 p. [in English]
Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/convention/ (accessed: 22.06.2024). [in English]
Cultural Landscapes, UNESCO, World Heritage Convention. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/#:~:text=There%20exist%20a%20great%20variety,peoples%20and%20their%20natural%20environment (accessed 22.06.2024). [in English]
Geotourism: The New Trend In Travel.Travel Industry Association of America. URL: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/11473270/geotourism-the-new-trend-in-travel-egret-communications (accessed 28.06.2024). [in English]
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf (accessed 22.06.2024). [in English]
Silberberg T. Cultural tourism and business opportunities for museums and heritage sites. Tourism Management. 1995, №16 (5). P. 361-365. [in English]
Taylor K., Feng H., Feng T. Cultural Landscapes and Asian Values: Negotiating a Transition from an International Experience to an Asian Regional Framework. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2007, P. 4-9. [in English]
The World Heritage Convention. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf.
Tighe A. Research on cultural tourism in the United States. Travel and Tourism Research Association Proceedings. 2021. P. 387-392. [in English]
Ahmetzhanova F.R., Alіmhan A.A. Kazak shygysynyn zher-su ataulary. Oskemen: ShKTU baspasy, 2000. B. 23-27. [in Kazakh]
Bajmyrzaev K.M., Tokpanov E.A. Taldykorgan onіrіnіn sakral'dy landshafttaryn korgau zhane utymdy pajdalanu. Monografija. Taldykorgan: І. Zhansugіrov atyndagy Zhetіsu memlekettіk universitetі, 2017. B. 65-66. [in Kazakh]
Berezovikov N. Alakol'skij gosudarstvennyj prirodnyj zapovednik. Zapovedniki srednej Aziii i Kazahstana. Almaty, 2006, Vyp. 1. S.12-13. [in Russian]
Burlibaeva M. i dr. Global'no znachimye vodno-bolotnye ugod'ja Kazahstana (Alakol'-Sasykkol'skaja sistema ozer). Astana, 2007. C. 126-127. [in Russian]
Vengin A. 13 trendov mirovogo turizma v 2024 godu. URL: https://profi.travel/articles/58917/details (accessed 11.06.2024). [in Russian]
Geografijalyk ornalasuy. Alakol memlekettіk tabigi korygy. URL: https://alakol-gpz.kz/kz/biz-turaly.html. (accessed 11.05.2024). [in Kazakh]
Golubev A.F. Ala-kul'. Zapiski RGO po obshhej geografii. 1867. T. I. S. 349-363. [in Russian]
Gordin V.Je., Sushhinskaja M., Jackevich I. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie podhody k razvitiju kul'turnogo turizma. Kul'turnyj turizm: konvergencija kul'tury i turizma na poroge HHI veka. SPb., 2001. C.124-125. [in Russian]
Esengabylova A.K. Kazakstanda emdіk-sauyktyru turizmіn damytudyn aleumettіk-jekonomikalyk algysharttary. L.N. Gumilev atyndagy EUU Habarshysy. Gumanitarlyk gylymdar serijasy. 2020. № 3 (112). B. 408-411. [in Kazakh]
Abdіrahmanov S. Toponimikalyk ataulardy kalyptastyru zhane standarttau maselelerі. Kazak onomastikasynyn ozektі maselelerі. Resp. gyl.-prak. konf. mat. Astana, 2004. B. 34-46. [in Kazakh]
Alіmhan A.A. Shygys Kazakstannyn ontustіk ajmagy toponimderіnіn tіldіk zhane jetnomadeni negіzderі: filol. gyl. kand. ... avtoref. Almaty, 2001. B.12-16. [in Kazakh]
Kaganskij V.L. Puteshestvie v landshafte i puteshestvie v kul'ture. Kul'tura v sovremennom mire: opyt, problemy, reshenija. M., 2001. S. 3-18. [in Russian]
Kajmuldinova K.D. Alakol atauyna katysty derekter. Vestnik KazNPU im.Abaja. Serija «Estestvenno-geograficheskie nauki». 2009, №4 (22). B.47-48. [in Kazakh]
Krupa E.G., Amirgalieva N.A., Lopareva T.Ja., Isaeva A.K., Bimanbaeva B.B. Zooplankton ozera Alakol' i ego raspredelenie v zavisimosti ot mineralizacii i himicheskogo sostava vody. Vestnik. Cerija: Biologicheskaja. 2010, №1 (43). S. 96-98. [in Russian]
Koryk tarihy. Alakol memlekettіk tabigi korygy. URL: https://alakol-gpz.kz/kz/koryk-tarikhy.html (accessed 11.05.2024). [in Kazakh]
Materialy po Kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniju, sobrannye i razrabotannye jekspediciej po issledovaniju stepnyh oblastej. Semipalatinskaja oblast'. Pavlodarskij uezd. SPb., 1903. T. 4. C. 212-219. URL: https://elib.rgo.ru/handle/123456789/213168 (accessed 01.10.2024). [in Russian]
Memleket basshysy turizmdі damytu zhonіnde kenes otkіzdі. 2024, 13 mausym. URL: https://www.akorda.kz/kz/memleket-basshysy-turizmdi-damytu-zhoninde-kenes-otkizdi-135368 (accessed 03.07.2024). [in Kazakh]
Obruchev V.A. Pogranichnaja Dzhungarija. SPb, 1932. T. 3, Vyp.1. C. 68-79. [in Russian]
Pallas P.S. Puteshestvie po raznym provincijam Rossijskoj imperii. SPb., 1786. Ch. 2. Kn.1. 476 s. [in Russian]
Popov A.V. Geograficheskoe polozhenie i stroenie poverhnosti Alakol'skoj vpadiny. Alakol'skaja vpadina i ee ozera. Alma-Ata, 1965. S. 15-45. [in Russian]
Rumjancev P.P. Materialy po obsledovaniju tuzemnogo i russkogo starozhil'cheskogo hozjajstva i zemlepol'zovanija v Semirechenskoj oblasti. Lepsinskij uezd. SPb., 1911. T.1. Vyp.1. S. 223-225. [in Russian]
Saparov K.T. Kazak shygysynyn ozen-kol ataulary: oku kuraly. Pavlodar, 2012. B. 68-74. [in Kazakh]
Saparov K.T. Shygys Kazakstan oblysynyn limnonimderіnіn kalyptasu erekshelіkterі. Іzdenіs. Zharatylystanu zhane tehnika gylymdary serijasy. Almaty. 2006, № 4. B. 84-88. [in Kazakh]
Sapozhnikov V.V. Ocherki Semirech'ja. Tomsk, 1904. S. 218-222. [in Russian]
Tomas U.A. Vostochnaja i Zapadnaja Sibir': rasskaz o semiletnih issledovanijah i prikljuchenijah v Sibiri, Mongolii, Kirgizskih stepjah, Kitajskoj Tartarii i chasti Central'noj Azii. N'ju-Jork: Harper i brat'ja, 1858. C.124-126. [in Russian]
Toleubaev A.T., Taleev D.A., Omarov G.K., Shagyrbaev M.S. Alakol zhagalauynda zhurgіzіlgen arheologijalyk kazba zhumystary. KR UGA Habarlary. Kogamdyk zhane Gumanitaryk gylymdar serijasy. 2014, №5 (297). B.12-13. [in Kazakh].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zh. Kishkenbayeva, Zh. Baisarina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.