The state and religious organizations in Кazakhstan in the 1940s-1990s: methodological aspects of studying the problem and systematization of source


Views: 21 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

Keywords:

state; confessions; methodology; religion; Soviet model; sources

Abstract

The state and religious confessions are the most important institutions of socio-political development of society, and the nature of the interaction of these institutions to a certain extent is an indicator of the civilization of society. The study and substantiation of the methodology for studying the interaction of the state and religious organizations in historical retrospect is relevant from the point of view of the need to generalize practical experience and extract lessons from the past. The theoretical and methodological basis for the study of state-religious relations in historical retrospect can be the principles of civilizational, institutional and interdisciplinary approaches. Each of them allows us to objectively and dynamically consider the evolution of interaction between the state and faiths in Kazakhstan in 1940-1990, to understand the cause-and-effect conditionality of the transformation of state religious policy, to identify and characterize regional specifics in the context of country-wide modernization processes, to summarize the regional historical experience of interaction between the state and religious organizations. The concept of cultural adaptation explains the mechanisms of habilitation of believers to changing political and legal realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktual'nye voprosy gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nyh otnoshenij v Respublike Kazahstan: sbornik materialov [Current issues of state-confessional relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan: collection of materials]. Almaty: Institut filosofii i politologii KN MON RK, 2012. 72 р. [In Russian]

Anderson J. Religious Liberty in Transitional Societies. The Politics of Religion. Cambridge University Press. 2003. [In English]

Bagaeva K.А. Vzaimootnoshenija gosudarstva i religii: osnovnye teoretiko-metodologicheskie podhody [Relationships between the state and religion: the main theoretical and methodological approaches]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. 2015. No. 6. Рр. 19-23. [In Russian]

Batorov T.P., Batorova S. E. Nekotorye sociologicheskie uchenija o vzaimodejstvii religii i gosudarstva [Some sociological doctrines of the interaction of religion and state]. Vestnik NGUJeU. 2016. № 2. Рр. 243-250. [In Russian]

Belkova A.A. Istoricheskij institucionalizm – novoe napravlenie v istoricheskih issledovanijah [Historical institutionalism – a new trend in historical researches]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. No.7-1. Рр. 117-121. [In Russian]

Danilevskij N.Ja. Rossija i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow: Institut russkoj civilizacii, 2008. 704 р. [In Russian]

Demerath N.J. Civil society and civil religion as mutually dependent // Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pр. 348-358. [In English]

Djurkgejm Je. O razdelenii obshhestvennogo truda. Metod sociologii [On the Division of Social Labor. The Method of Sociology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 575 р. [In Russian]

Georgieva N.G. Klassifikacija i polikonfessional'nost' istoricheskih istochnikov [Classification and multi-confessional nature of historical sources]. Vestnik RUDN. Serija: Istorija Rossii. 2016. No. 1. Рр. 7-19. [In Russian]

Ippolitov G.M. Sistemnyj podhod k poznaniju istorii: diskussionnye razmyshlenija o nekotoryh aspektah mnogoaspektnoj problemy v lapidarnom izlozhenii [A systems approach to the knowledge of history: controversial reflections on some aspects of a multifaceted problem in a lapidary presentation]. Samarskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2017. Т. 6. No. 2 (19). Рр. 192-199. [In Russian]

Jelen T.G., Wilcox С. Religion. The one, the few, and the many // Religion and Politics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press. 2002. Pр. 1-7. [In English].

Hal'bvaks M. Kollektivnaja i istoricheskaja pamjat' [Collective and historical memory]. Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2005. No. 2-3. Рр. 8-27. [In Russian]

Kardashevskij A.V., Tirskih M.G. Sovremennye koncepcii gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nyh otnoshenij. «Sushhnostnye» modeli [Modern concepts of state-confessional relations. “Essential" models]. Sibirskij juridicheskij vestnik [Siberian legal bulletin]. 2009. No. 2 (45). Рр. 25-33. [In Russian]

Levchuk D.V. Osobennosti vzaimootnoshenija politiki i religii [Features of the relationship between politics and religion] // Politika, gosudarstvo i pravo. [Politics, state and law] 2013. No. 1 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://politika.snauka.ru/2013/01/624 (date of access: 14.05.2024)

Lur'e C.B. Istoricheskaja jetnologija [Historical Ethnology]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. 1997. 445 р. [In Russian]

Markarjan Je.S. Osnovnye problemy jetnicheskoj jekologii [The main problems of ethnic ecology]. Ethnographic review [Jetnograficheskoe obozrenie]. 1983. No.1. Рр. 3-16. [In Russian]

Mchedlova Е. М. Obraz budushhego vzaimodejstvija gosudarstva i religiozno-obshhestvennyh sil [The image of the future interaction of the state and religious-social forces]. // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge Understanding Skill]. 2022. No. 3(16). Рр. 177-184. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2022.3.16 [In Russian]

Parsons T.O social’nyh sistemah [About social systems]. Moscow, 2002. 749 p. [In Russian].

Prokopenko Е.Е. Tendencii i rubezhi vzaimovlijanija gosudarstva i religioznoj organizacii kak strukturnogo jelementa grazhdanskogo obshhestva v sovremennyh rossijskih uslovijah [Trends and frontiers of interference of the state and religious organizations as a structural element of a civil society in modern Russian conditions ]. Theories and Problems of Political Studies. 2016. No. 5 (6А). Рр. 267-285. [In Russian]

Shahov M.O., Shutova O.S. Gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nye otnoshenija: analiz tipologij i "silovaja model'" [State-confessional relations: analysis of typologies and the "power model"]. Politija. 2003. No.3. Рр. 158–178. [In Russian]

Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoj istorii. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy [The Decline of Europe. Essays on the Morphology of World History. World-Historical Perspectives]. T. 1-2. Moscow: Mysl'. 1993. 663 р. [In Russian]

Steward J.H. Theory of Culture Change. Urbane, 1955. Pр. 36-41. [In English]

Tojnbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii: sb. [Understanding History: collection]. Рer. s angl. E.D. Zharkova. Moscow: Ajris Press, 2010. 640 р. [In Russian]

Uest K., Zimmerman D. Sozdanie gendera. Per. s angl. E. Zdravomyslovoy. Gendernyetetradi.Vyp.1. Trudy SPb-filiala IS RAN. Saint Petersburg: IS RAN, 1997. Рр. 94-120. [In Russian]

Zvorygin R. Analiz vozmozhnostej primenenija metodov kolichestvennogo analiza dlja izuchenija vzaimodejstvija organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti i religioznyh obedinenij [Analysis of the Possibilities of Using Quantitative Analysis Methods to Study the Interaction of Public Authorities and Religious Associations]. Mnogomernost' obshhestva: cifrovoj povorot v gumanitarnom znanii: 3-j molodezhnyj konvent: Мaterialy mezhdunarodnoj studencheskoj konferencii (Ekaterinburg, 14-16 marta 2019 g.). Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2019. Рр. 578-580. [In Russian]

Weber M. Protestantskaja jetika i duh kapitalizma [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism] / M. Veber. Izbr. proizv. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 808 р. [In Russian]

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Аytpaevna . G. ., Aubakirova , K. ., & Sametova , G. . (2024). The state and religious organizations in Кazakhstan in the 1940s-1990s: methodological aspects of studying the problem and systematization of source. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 149(4). Retrieved from https://bulhistphaa.enu.kz/index.php/main/article/view/876

Issue

Section

RELIGION SERIES