The philosophical nature of oratory in the context of the national theater


Views: 96 / PDF downloads: 76

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2023-144-3-232-243

Keywords:

Theatre; rhetoric; stage; being; national art; existence; knowledge system; folklore; tradition.

Abstract

The philosophical nature of oratory in the context of the national theater was determined and theoretical considerations were made in the scientific article. At the same time, it was confirmed that the roots of the philosophical essence of the art of oratory in the context of the national theater can be traced back to the traditions of the ancestors in ancient times, selecting the main social and cultural norms, and it was determined that the art of oratory is the heir of the cultural and spiritual wealth of the people formed over the centuries in the course of their further development.  The article distinguishes that the national theater is an expression of the freedom of thought, recognition and action of the Kazakh society. It can be justified that the art of Kazakh oratory is both a platform and a cornerstone of the manifestation of human conscience and freedom of language. It is always based on the thought system, thought process, thought flow that leads to the abyss of world life. From this point of view, modern philosophical researches are first of all based on classical works of Kazakh theater, national folklore, including eloquent words, and we study the vital worldview of the Kazakh nation, the country's own system of knowledge, and the process of thinking. Therefore, here we believe that the spiritual and philosophical thoughts and ideas will be the methodological backbone of the nation, when the art of Kazakh oratory is connected with the art of Kazakh theater.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

Malikova, A. M. ., & Imanjussip, R. N. . (2023). The philosophical nature of oratory in the context of the national theater. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 144(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2023-144-3-232-243

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY